Skip to Main Content
Bibliography
Harvard Library Office for Scholarly Communication. (2018). Model Open Access Policy .
University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). Author Rights .
University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). SHAREOK .
University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). Evaluating Publishers .
Iowa State University Libraries. (October 18, 2019). Faculty senate green lights negotiation principles with unanimous vote .
University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). OU Libraries Serials Projects .
University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). Open Access .
University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). University Libraries Committee – Scholarly Communication Taskforce .
University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). ULC Scholarly Communication Taskforce Charge and Deliverables .
University of Arizona Ad-Hoc Committee on Open Access. (n.d.). Recommendations for an Open Access Policy for the University of Arizona .
Oregon State University Task Force on Scholarly Communication. (May 12, 2005). Scholarly Communication Task Force Draft Report to Faculty Senate .
Harvard Library Office for Scholarly Communication. (2018). Open Access Policies .
Florida State University. (n.d). Open Access @ FSU .
Rutgers University Libraries. (2020). Open Access Policy and SOAR .
Georgia Tech Library. (2020). Open Access at Georgia Tech .
University of Colorado Boulder. (n.d.). University of Colorado Boulder Campus Open Access Policy .
Harvard Library Office for Scholarly Communication. (2018). Model Open Access Policy .
Association of Research Libraries. (2019). Graph 4 Expenditure Trends in ARL University Libraries, 1998-2018 . in Morris, S., and Roebuck, G. Editors. ARL Statistics 2017–2018 . Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). OU Libraries Serials Projects / OU Trends .
Duke University Libraries. (n.d.). Library 101 Toolkit, Scale of Scholarly Publishing .
Butler, B. and Unsworth, J. (January 22, 2018). Research Information Costs at the University of Virginia .
Damodaran, A. (January 2020). Margins by Sector (US) .
Scholarly Publishing and Academic Research Coalition / SPARC. (2020). Open Access .
Tennant JP, Waldner F, Jacques DC et al. The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review [version 3; peer review: 4 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2016, 5:632. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8460.3.
Gargouri Y, Hajjem C, Larivière V, et al. (2010) Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research . PLoS ONE 5(10): e13636. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013636.
Norris, M. (2009). The Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles .
Eysenbach, G. (2006). The Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles . PLOS Biology 4(5): e157. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157.
McKiernan, E.C., Bourne, P.E., Brown, C.T., et. al. (2016). How Open Science Helps Researchers Succeed . eLife, 5:e16800. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16800.
Davis P., Lewenstein B., Simon D., et al. (2008). Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial . BMJ 337:a568. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a568.
Norris, M., Oppenheim, C. and Rowland, F. (2008). The citation advantage of openâaccess articles . Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology . 59. 1963-1972. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20898.
Wang, X., Mao, W., Xu, S., et. al. (2014). Usage History of Scientific Literature: Nature Metrics and Metrics of Nature Publications . arXiv :1304.7653v3. https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.7653. Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1167-5.
Davis, P. M. (2011). Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing. FASEB Journal . 25, 2129– 2134. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.11-183988.
Adie, E. (2014). Attention! A study of open access vs. non-open access articles .
Springer Nature. (2020). Benefits of Open Research .
Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview .
Tennant JP, Waldner F, Jacques DC et al. (2016). The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review [version 3; peer review: 4 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research , 5:632. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8460.3.
Khoo, S.Y.-S. (2019). Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis . LIBER Quarterly , 29(1), pp.1–18.
University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). SHAREOK .
University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). Author Rights .
University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). Scholarly Communication .
Cornell University. (2020). arXiv.org .
Severin A., Egger M., Eve, M.P. and Hürlimann D. Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research , 7:1925. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17328.2.
Scholarly Publishing and Academic Research Coalition / SPARC. (2016). Browse Article Sharing Requirements by Federal Agency .
Crossick, G. (2016). Monographs and Open Access . Insights 29 (1): 14–19. http://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.280
Ferwerda, E., Pinter, F., Stern, N. (2017). A Landscape Study on Open Access and Monographs: Policies, Funding and Publishing in Eight European Countries . Zenodo . http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.815932
Fitzpatrick, K. (2012). Openness, value, and scholarly societies: The Modern Language Association model . College & Research Libraries News , 73(11), 650-653.
Transitioning Society Publications to Open Access. (n.d.). TSPOA: Transitioning Society Publications to Open Access .
Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association. (2020). Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association: The international community of open access publishers .
Wise, A., Estelle, L. (2019). Learned Societies, the key to realizing an open access future? London School of Economics LSE Impact Blog . https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2019/06/24/learned-societies-the-key-to-realising-an-open-access-future/.
Resnick, B., Belluz, J. (2019). The rise in OA biomedical preprints over time in The war to free science . Vox. https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/6/3/18271538/open-access-elsevier-california-sci-hub-academic-paywalls.
Niles M., Schimanski L., McKiernan E., Alperin J. (2020). Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations . PLOS ONE 15(3): e0228914. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228914
American Society for Cell Biology (2020). DORA: Improving how research is assessed .
Schimanski L., Alperin J. (2018). The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research , 7:1605 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16493.1.
University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). Scholarly Communication Taskforce Readings and Resources .
University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). University Libraries Committee – Scholarly Communication Taskforce .
University of Southampton. (n.d.). ROARMAP: Registry of Open Access Repository Mandates and Policies . Query results: http://roarmap.eprints.org/cgi/search/archive/advanced?screen=Search&dataset=archive&country=840&policymaker_type=research_org&policymaker_type=research_org_subunit&policymaker_name_merge=ALL&policymaker_name=&policy_adoption=&policy_effecive=&mandate_content_types_merge=ANY&apc_fun_url_merge=ALL&apc_fun_url=&satisfyall=ALL&order=policymaker_name&_action_search=Search
University of Southampton. (n.d.). ROARMAP: Registry of Open Access Repository Mandates and Policies .
Back to top