Skip to Main Content

Bibliography

  1. Harvard Library Office for Scholarly Communication. (2018). Model Open Access Policy.
  2. University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). Author Rights.
  3. University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). SHAREOK.
  4. University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). Evaluating Publishers.
  5. Iowa State University Libraries. (October 18, 2019). Faculty senate green lights negotiation principles with unanimous vote.
  6. University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). OU Libraries Serials Projects.
  7. University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). Open Access.
  8. University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). University Libraries Committee – Scholarly Communication Taskforce.
  9. University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). ULC Scholarly Communication Taskforce Charge and Deliverables.
  10. University of Arizona Ad-Hoc Committee on Open Access. (n.d.). Recommendations for an Open Access Policy for the University of Arizona.
  11. Oregon State University Task Force on Scholarly Communication. (May 12, 2005). Scholarly Communication Task Force Draft Report to Faculty Senate.
  12. Harvard Library Office for Scholarly Communication. (2018). Open Access Policies.
  13. Florida State University. (n.d). Open Access @ FSU.
  14. Rutgers University Libraries. (2020). Open Access Policy and SOAR.
  15. Georgia Tech Library. (2020). Open Access at Georgia Tech.
  16. University of Colorado Boulder. (n.d.). University of Colorado Boulder Campus Open Access Policy.
  17. Harvard Library Office for Scholarly Communication. (2018). Model Open Access Policy.
  18. Association of Research Libraries. (2019). Graph 4 Expenditure Trends in ARL University Libraries, 1998-2018.  in Morris, S., and Roebuck, G. Editors. ARL Statistics 2017–2018. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
  19. University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). OU Libraries Serials Projects / OU Trends.
  20. Duke University Libraries. (n.d.). Library 101 Toolkit, Scale of Scholarly Publishing.
  21. Butler, B. and Unsworth, J. (January 22, 2018). Research Information Costs at the University of Virginia.
  22. Damodaran, A. (January 2020). Margins by Sector (US).
  23. Scholarly Publishing and Academic Research Coalition / SPARC. (2020). Open Access.
  24. Tennant JP, Waldner F, Jacques DC et al. The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review [version 3; peer review: 4 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2016, 5:632. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8460.3.
  25. Gargouri Y, Hajjem C, Larivière V, et al. (2010) Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research. PLoS ONE 5(10): e13636. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013636.
  26. Norris, M. (2009). The Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles.
  27. Eysenbach, G. (2006). The Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles. PLOS Biology 4(5): e157. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157.
  28. McKiernan, E.C., Bourne, P.E., Brown, C.T., et. al. (2016). How Open Science Helps Researchers Succeed. eLife, 5:e16800. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16800.
  29. Davis P., Lewenstein B., Simon D., et al. (2008). Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 337:a568. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a568.
  30. Norris, M., Oppenheim, C. and Rowland, F. (2008). The citation advantage of open‐access articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59. 1963-1972. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20898.
  31. Wang, X., Mao, W., Xu, S., et. al. (2014). Usage History of Scientific Literature: Nature Metrics and Metrics of Nature Publications. arXiv:1304.7653v3. https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.7653. Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1167-5.
  32. Davis, P. M. (2011). Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing. FASEB Journal. 25, 2129– 2134. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.11-183988.
  33. Adie, E. (2014). Attention! A study of open access vs. non-open access articles.
  34. Springer Nature. (2020). Benefits of Open Research.
  35. Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview.
  36. Tennant JP, Waldner F, Jacques DC et al. (2016). The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review [version 3; peer review: 4 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research, 5:632. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8460.3.
  37. Khoo, S.Y.-S. (2019). Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis. LIBER Quarterly, 29(1), pp.1–18.
  38. University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). SHAREOK.
  39. University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). Author Rights.
  40. University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). Scholarly Communication.
  41. Cornell University. (2020). arXiv.org.
  42. Severin A., Egger M., Eve, M.P. and Hürlimann D. Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research, 7:1925. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17328.2.
  43. Scholarly Publishing and Academic Research Coalition / SPARC. (2016). Browse Article Sharing Requirements by Federal Agency.
  44. Crossick, G. (2016). Monographs and Open Access. Insights 29 (1): 14–19. http://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.280
  45. Ferwerda, E., Pinter, F., Stern, N. (2017). A Landscape Study on Open Access and Monographs: Policies, Funding and Publishing in Eight European Countries. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.815932
  46. Fitzpatrick, K. (2012). Openness, value, and scholarly societies: The Modern Language Association model. College & Research Libraries News, 73(11), 650-653.
  47. Transitioning Society Publications to Open Access. (n.d.). TSPOA: Transitioning Society Publications to Open Access.
  48. Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association. (2020). Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association: The international community of open access publishers.
  49. Wise, A., Estelle, L. (2019). Learned Societies, the key to realizing an open access future? London School of Economics LSE Impact Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2019/06/24/learned-societies-the-key-to-realising-an-open-access-future/.
  50. Resnick, B., Belluz, J. (2019). The rise in OA biomedical preprints over time in The war to free science. Vox. https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/6/3/18271538/open-access-elsevier-california-sci-hub-academic-paywalls.
  51. Niles M., Schimanski L., McKiernan E., Alperin J. (2020). Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations. PLOS ONE 15(3): e0228914. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228914 
  52. American Society for Cell Biology (2020). DORA: Improving how research is assessed.
  53. Schimanski L., Alperin J. (2018). The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research, 7:1605 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16493.1.
  54. University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). Scholarly Communication Taskforce Readings and Resources.
  55. University of Oklahoma Libraries. (2020). University Libraries Committee – Scholarly Communication Taskforce.
  56. University of Southampton. (n.d.). ROARMAP: Registry of Open Access Repository Mandates and Policies. Query results: http://roarmap.eprints.org/cgi/search/archive/advanced?screen=Search&dataset=archive&country=840&policymaker_type=research_org&policymaker_type=research_org_subunit&policymaker_name_merge=ALL&policymaker_name=&policy_adoption=&policy_effecive=&mandate_content_types_merge=ANY&apc_fun_url_merge=ALL&apc_fun_url=&satisfyall=ALL&order=policymaker_name&_action_search=Search
  57. University of Southampton. (n.d.). ROARMAP: Registry of Open Access Repository Mandates and Policies.